A Golf Decision on Video Replay

The USGA and R&A have finally made a decision on video call ins from fans. After the a crazy year of armchair referees calling in to challenge and effectively award unrealistic penalty strokes on professional golfers, the governing bodies of golf have made a decision. Unfortunately, their direction is weak and does not address the root of the problem!

The failure of the governing bodies to effectively address the viewer call in is a bit disheartening. They half-heartedly bowed to the social media pressure of the Lexi Thompson debacle or the Anna Nordqvist grain of sand foolishness and as a result have offered this compromise.

New Decision 34-3/10 implements two standards for Rules committees to limit the use of video: 1) when video reveals evidence that could not reasonably be seen with the “naked eye,” and 2) when players use their “reasonable judgment” to determine a specific location when applying the Rules.

The first standard states, “the use of video technology can make it possible to identify things that could not be seen with the naked eye.” An example includes a player who unknowingly touches a few grains of sand in taking a backswing with a club in a bunker when making a stroke.

If the committee concludes that such facts could not reasonably have been seen with the naked eye and the player was not otherwise aware of the potential breach, the player will be deemed not to have breached the Rules, even when video technology shows otherwise. This is an extension of the provision on ball-at-rest-moved cases, which was introduced in 2014.

The second standard applies when a player determines a spot, point, position, line, area, distance or other location in applying the Rules, and recognizes that a player should not be held to the degree of precision that can sometimes be provided by video technology. Examples include determining the nearest point of relief or replacing a lifted ball.

So long as the player does what can reasonably be expected under the circumstances to make an accurate determination, the player’s reasonable judgment will be accepted, even if later shown to be inaccurate by the use of video evidence. USGA Rules

I read the text from the USGA and find that their decision falls short anything meaningful. The tournament committee still has wiggle room to determine if the call in has any validity. Their decision is nothing more than trying to placate the masses without having to make a real stance.

My stance is that the only decision that should have come from the governing bodies is that call-ins are no longer entertained. Call-ins have no place in the golfing world, but unfortunately the overall decision regarding these needless would be referees is about ratings. I think that the USGA and the R&A had a chance to make a real impact, but economics prevents any real change.

So, moving forward, we shall see if the decision has made any real difference on call-ins. Unfortunately, I am not convinced. What do you think?

I am a grateful golfer! See you on the links!

10 thoughts on “A Golf Decision on Video Replay

  1. Jim, you nailed it. These guys just don’t understand that we will keep watching even if our “privilege” to call in and blow the whistle on Lexi Thompson is removed. The game is supposed to be refereed by the players themselves. What we need is a vocal segment of tour players to come out against this band-aid and advocate for removal of all call ins.

    Liked by 1 person

      • Jim, I don’t think they will because the incidents of replay impacting an outcome are not nearly as frequent as in team sports. They think, “It’ll never happen to me.” It would probably take something huge to get the players to act. Like maybe Phil gets screwed out of a US Open win.



        Liked by 1 person

  2. Jim, I say get rid of call-ins. Players should (and are always) responsible for their own fractions. These pro’s make it to this level because they are “professionals” and the sport is intertwined with ntegrity for the game and your playing partners.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s