The third instalment of the new 2019 rules focuses on an embedded ball. This rule is often misunderstood and as a result, the golf governing bodies have decided tried to simplify the Rule 16.3 for all levels of players. I understand the reasoning for the change, but do not necessarily agree that it meets their intent.
I can appreciate the frustration of finding my ball embedded in soft ground on the fairway. However, it is even more frustrating is finding my ball embedded in the rough or the woods. By the old rules, my ball off the fairway would be considered unplayable and I would have to follow the old Rule 28 and award myself a 1 stroke penalty (there are other penalties depending on the situation). I had several options for the drop, but that is all in the past now.
Before moving forward, it is important to understand a new term: general area. Basically, it means all areas on the course that is not considered a teeing area or hazard. The old term we used was “through the green”.
Under the new rule 16.3, I would be allowed a free drop, as indicated in the infographic above, with no penalty. A free drop outside side a hazard is always a great thing for any golfer. Under the new rules, the relief has changed and is limiting. I understand their reasoning of removing the element of chance for embedding your ball off the “closely mowed areas”, but do not necessarily agree with their approach.
I think that rule 16.3 rewards wayward shots. Players who miss the fairway or hit their ball in the woods can be rewarded for a poor shot by an embedded ball. I realize others will suggest that tacking on another stroke for an unlucky bounce (embedded ball) is not fair either, but I suggest that is part of golf. It is my opinion that we should not be rewarded for wayward shots.
I am sure there are those who relish this new rule and that is completely fine. Rule 16.3 is in effect and I will accept it immediately. This is just one step in the evolution of golf and the governing bodies are trying to make it the best game ever.
Do you agree with the new rule on embedded ball relief in the general area?
I am a grateful golfer! See you on the links!
The Grateful Golfer 
Pingback: Turning A Blind Eye To Rules Infractions | The Grateful Golfer
My question is simple. Should Reed have had a second opinion before he touched the ball
LikeLiked by 1 person
Technically, PR did not break the rules. However, In my opinion, once a player calls for the referee, they should never touch the ball. It was bad form on PR part. Thanks for the question.
Cheers Jim
LikeLike
Should he have asked for a 2nd opinion to avoid a Rules violation? No, not according to Rules 16.3 & 16.4. Should he have done so in order to avoid a media controversy – yes probably so. However, Rory had a very similar situation on #18 on the same day. He did not get a 2nd opinion either before or after touching the ball. Yet there was no media controversy. One could argue that Reed went above and beyond what Rory did. Both players proceeded correctly under the rules.
LikeLike
David,
I agree technically, neither player did anything wrong. In the case of Patrick Reed, he waved the official over and then moved his ball and searched for the embedded ball make. I suggest that if he was going to call the official over, wait until they arrive before doing anything. If he did not call the official over, then he should have continued like McIlroy and take the drop. Unfortunately, past performance skewed the perception of the viewers and we all know that perception is reality.
Cheers Jim
LikeLike
That’s cool Jim. Happy to be used as a source.
DAVID
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jim, this not allowed in sand even when sand is outside of the bunker. Seems like every rule has exceptions.
LikeLike
David,
Sorry for the long response. I had to think about this for a bit. What rule are you citing?
Cheers Jim
LikeLike
Jim the rule says:
Rule 16.3 allows relief for a ball embedded anywhere in the “general area” (that is, the area previously known as “through the green”), except when embedded in sand.
Bunkers are NOT part of the General Area so the comment “except when embedded in sand” refers to sand not in Bunkers. Earlier this month I attended a 3 day Rules Workshop presented by USGA and PGA. They specifically said the rule does not allow relief from sand in General Area.
I hope this helps.
LikeLike
David
That is perfect. I am goimg to turn your response into a blog and use you as my expert source. Thanks.
Cheers Jim
LikeLike
Tough call. If it’s wet enough to embed on the fairway, it’s wet enough to embed in the rough. But that’s not always the case the other way around. The higher grass as well as trees and shrubs can block the sun and leave the rough wet longer. Sometimes days longer during times of high humidity and little breeze.
The course was wet enough to embed today. None of mine stayed embeded, but there was a lot of lift clean and place going on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lift, clean and place is a great rule and common sense should pervail when using it. It does offer a distinct advantage, but itnis fsir for everyone. I hope you played well.
Cheers Jim
LikeLike
I wish I could say I did, but it was an off day for me. But without a few bad days, we wouldn’t appreciate the great ones so much. All I can say about the day was the few good shots I had were really good, and I ended the day well with a birdie.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Kevin
We all have thise days. You are right about tough days making great days even greatwr. At least you are playing.
Cheers Jim
LikeLike